<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: What separation pattern do you prefer in Silverlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joel.neubeck.net/2009/02/poll-separation-pattern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joel.neubeck.net/2009/02/poll-separation-pattern/</link>
	<description>Simplifing structure without changing results</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 01:08:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill simons</title>
		<link>http://joel.neubeck.net/2009/02/poll-separation-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>bill simons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel.neubeck.net/?p=334#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Tim I wish there were more videos using jquery silvelight and asp.net mvc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim I wish there were more videos using jquery silvelight and asp.net mvc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: POLL: Silverlight developer patterns</title>
		<link>http://joel.neubeck.net/2009/02/poll-separation-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>POLL: Silverlight developer patterns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel.neubeck.net/?p=334#comment-755</guid>
		<description>[...] Poll: What separation pattern do you prefer in Silverlight development? tags: silverlight, mvvm, mvc, mvp, xaml, wpf, patterns, m-v-vm, viewmodelThis work is licensed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Poll: What separation pattern do you prefer in Silverlight development? tags: silverlight, mvvm, mvc, mvp, xaml, wpf, patterns, m-v-vm, viewmodelThis work is licensed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Papa</title>
		<link>http://joel.neubeck.net/2009/02/poll-separation-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>John Papa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel.neubeck.net/?p=334#comment-754</guid>
		<description>I voted MVVM, but MVP is a close second. I think MVP is easier for people to grasp while MVVM has a lot more that people have to get their arms around. The true answer is always it depends, but generally I choose MVVM. 

When I consult, sometimes we choose no separation pattern to start out with. When people are learning REST, Astoria, and Silverlight already its tough to throw a pattern at them like this. Usually I ease them into one that suits their team&#039;s skills. Sometimes we get caught up in patterns and guidance while many developers are just trying to get a handle on getting the job done.

But for me ... I use MVVM foremost and MVP secondarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted MVVM, but MVP is a close second. I think MVP is easier for people to grasp while MVVM has a lot more that people have to get their arms around. The true answer is always it depends, but generally I choose MVVM. </p>
<p>When I consult, sometimes we choose no separation pattern to start out with. When people are learning REST, Astoria, and Silverlight already its tough to throw a pattern at them like this. Usually I ease them into one that suits their team&#8217;s skills. Sometimes we get caught up in patterns and guidance while many developers are just trying to get a handle on getting the job done.</p>
<p>But for me &#8230; I use MVVM foremost and MVP secondarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
