<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Will Flash developers learn Silverlight?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joel.neubeck.net/2008/07/poll-will-flash-developers-learn-silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joel.neubeck.net/2008/07/poll-will-flash-developers-learn-silverlight/</link>
	<description>Simplifing structure without changing results</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fallon Massey</title>
		<link>http://joel.neubeck.net/2008/07/poll-will-flash-developers-learn-silverlight/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Fallon Massey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joel.neubeck.net/?p=191#comment-660</guid>
		<description>Nobody in their right mind will use SilverLight on the internet for a long time.

If the Flash developers are on an intranet, maybe, but WPF may be a better choice there.

Until a user can just go to a page with SilverLight and use it, just like Flash, SilverLight won't see the light of day on the Web.

I suspect that will happen some time next year... if it gets released this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody in their right mind will use SilverLight on the internet for a long time.</p>
<p>If the Flash developers are on an intranet, maybe, but WPF may be a better choice there.</p>
<p>Until a user can just go to a page with SilverLight and use it, just like Flash, SilverLight won&#8217;t see the light of day on the Web.</p>
<p>I suspect that will happen some time next year&#8230; if it gets released this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
